Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Whiteway Manufacturing Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1984No. 84-262PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the provision in R.C. 4123.5191 requiring inclusion of the date of the decision ap*20pealed from in a workers’ compensation notice of appeal is jurisdictional. We hold that it is not jurisdictional, and thus reverse the decision of the court of appeals.

In Akron Standard Div. v. Lindley (1984), 11 Ohio St. 3d 10, this court was recently presented with a similar case in the context of tax reassessment petitions. The taxpayer in Akron Standard had failed to comply with the verification requirement of R.C. 5739.132 in filing its reassessment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cadle v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Akron Standard Division of Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. FordOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. Ameritemps, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Spencer v. Freight Handlers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Wells v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Austin Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State ex rel. Lapp Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API