Legal Opinion · Dissent

Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2019No. SC: 157729; COA: 332536; SC: 157730; COA: 335440; SC: 157731; COA: 335527Published

1Dissent

Zahra, J. (dissenting).

I would grant the application in these two consolidated class actions.

These consolidated cases feature a long and protracted legal history that has yet to include any substantive review by this Court. Plaintiffs represent juvenile prisoners who claim that they were subjected to sexual assaults, sexual harassment, and degrading treatment by prison staff and adult prisoners. Plaintiffs, who are mostly juvenile male inmates serving terms of imprisonment in the custody of the Department of Corrections (DOC) brought claims against the Governor, the DOC, the former and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hamed v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Shepherd Montessori Center Milan v. Ann Arbor Charter TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Neal v. CORRECTIONS DEPT.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Neal v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API