Napa State Hospital v. Dasso
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. James A. Devoto, and Devoto & Richardson, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
JThis action was brought to recover a specified sum for the care, support, and maintenance of Emanuello Dasso alleged to be confined in the Napa State Hospital as an insane person by virtue of an order of commitment duly made and given by the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco after proceedings regularly had, and is maintained by plaintiff under the act of the legislature known as the “Insanity Law,” approved March 31, 1897. (Stats. 1897, p. 311.)
A judgment was rendered for plaintiff and this appeal is taken by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
It…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maia's Adm'r v. Eastern State HospitalSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
- White v. Alabama Insane HospitalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- In Re Estate of YturburruCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Matter of Application of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Veal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re GibsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re Idleman's CommitmentOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. MacEy v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. HockingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.