Legal Opinion

In Re Idleman's Commitment

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1933PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is the validity of 1931 Session Laws, chapter 187, the title of which is: “Requiring payment by the estate and/or relatives, who are financially able to do so, for the care and maintenance of insane and feeble-minded persons committed to state institutions, and requiring counties to pay for maintenance in certain cases; to be administered by the state board of control, and providing an appropriation therefor.” Section 1 of the act provides that if any person committed to a state institution for the insane or the feeble-minded “or a close relative of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Sporza v. . German Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Crocker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Williams v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. Mallatt v. LUIHNOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Cornelison v. SeaboldOregon Supreme Court · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API