In Re Idleman's Commitment
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is the validity of 1931 Session Laws, chapter 187, the title of which is: “Requiring payment by the estate and/or relatives, who are financially able to do so, for the care and maintenance of insane and feeble-minded persons committed to state institutions, and requiring counties to pay for maintenance in certain cases; to be administered by the state board of control, and providing an appropriation therefor.” Section 1 of the act provides that if any person committed to a state institution for the insane or the feeble-minded “or a close relative of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1917
- Sporza v. . German Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Crocker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Williams v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Mallatt v. LUIHNOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Cornelison v. SeaboldOregon Supreme Court · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.