Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. MacEy v. Johnson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1931No. 5700PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Respondent, guardian of a patient confined in a state insane asylum, sued by appellant under C S., sec. 1190, amended 1921 Sess. Laws, p. 388, successfully demurred, in the trial court, to such action on the ground that said statute is in conflict with this portion of sec. 1, art. 10, of the Constitution: “Institutions .... for the benefit of the insane .... shall be established and supported by the state in such a manner as may be prescribed by law,” and sec. 13, art. 1, contending “established and supported by the state” excludes enforced contribution from the inmate, his estate or…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Idaho Power & Light Co. v. BlomquistIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Smallwood v. JeterIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Ingard v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Packard v. O'NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Speer v. StephensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. HoaglandIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Eberle v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Caesar v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Idaho Telephone Company v. BairdIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. In Re Idleman's CommitmentOregon Supreme Court · 1933

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API