People v. Maxwell
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County and from an order refusing a new trial. E. D. Ham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Defendant, convicted of the crime of perjury, appeals from the judgment, from the order denying his motion in arrest of judgment, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The perjury charged was a false oath made by defendant as to matters contained in his petition and schedules in insolvency.
It is first insisted that the information is defective and fails to charge the crime in this, that it is alleged that at the time defendant filed his petition and schedules in insolvency he was the owner of a note referred to in the information and alleged to have been omitted from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- People v. RoblesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- State v. CerfoglioNevada Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. Di GiacomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Girard v. GirardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. RoubusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.