Legal Opinion

State v. Cerfoglio

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1923No. 2501PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*337By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

An order was heretofore entered affirming the judgment in this case, for the reason that no bill of exceptions had been made a part of the record. 46 Nev. 331. Thereafter counsel for the state stipulated that a bill of exceptions had been duly settled, and that the order affirming the judgment might be vacated and the case be considered upon its merits, which was accordingly ordered. This is an appeal after conviction upon a charge of perjury, alleged to have been committed during the trial of appellant for a violation of the prohibition statute.

The testimony given by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. People v. . DoodyNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. People v. ChadwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Dill v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  5. State v. KimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. State v. HooverOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Tucker v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Brown v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Marvel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1925

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API