McGlynn v. Moore
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Defendants recovered judgment in the Court below, and plaintiffs appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Rhodes, J.
David C. Broderick, the appellant’s testator, on the fourteenth of July, 1859, executed to the respondents a lease of certain real estate in the City of San Francisco, for the term of nine years and three months. The habendum clause is as follows: li To have and to hold said premises unto said parties of the second part, from the first day of July, 1859, for and during and until the end and term of. nine years and three months thence next ensuing.” The time for the payment of the monthly instalments of rent is specified in these words, “ payable monthly on the last day…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bleecker v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Jackson ex dem. Church v. BrownsonNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Jackson ex dem. Lewis v. SchutzNew York Supreme Court · 1820
- Deyo v. BleakleyNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Jackson ex dem. Norton v. SheldonNew York Supreme Court · 1826
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- German-American Sav. Bank v. GollmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Kern Sunset Oil Co. v. Good Roads Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Hicks v. BeachamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.