Legal Opinion

Salton Community Services District v. Southhard

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1967No. Civ. 8704PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment upon a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff in an unlawful detainer action.

The judgment, in effect, makes no adjudication; recites the verdict of the jury finding ‘ ‘ plaintiff is entitled to restitution of the premises involved and costs of suit”; but decrees plaintiff “is awarded judgment against defendants ... in the sum of-Dollars ($-), lawful money of the United ’ States,-and for his costs fixed at-Dollars ($-).”

The judgment in the form entered obviously is the product of a clerical error and is subject to correction ex parte. Under these…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Sapolin Paints, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  2. Nordstrom Commission CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Highland Plastics, Inc. v. EndersAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
  4. In Re Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  5. Gasser v. Jet Craft Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API