Salton Community Services District v. Southhard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment upon a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff in an unlawful detainer action.
The judgment, in effect, makes no adjudication; recites the verdict of the jury finding ‘ ‘ plaintiff is entitled to restitution of the premises involved and costs of suit”; but decrees plaintiff “is awarded judgment against defendants ... in the sum of-Dollars ($-), lawful money of the United ’ States,-and for his costs fixed at-Dollars ($-).”
The judgment in the form entered obviously is the product of a clerical error and is subject to correction ex parte. Under these…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Sapolin Paints, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Nordstrom Commission CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Highland Plastics, Inc. v. EndersAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
- In Re Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Gasser v. Jet Craft Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.