Legal Opinion

Garbutt v. Southern Clays, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided August 4, 1995No. 5:93-cv-00433PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

OWENS, District Judge.

Before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, the relevant caselaw, and the record as a whole, the court issues the following order.

I. INTRODUCTION

Even though the law of the forum state governs the substantive aspects of this diversity case, “federal law controls the procedural aspects.” Hammer v. Slater, 20 F.3d 1137, 1140 (11th Cir.1994). Thus, the movant is entitled to summary judgment if the pleadings, depositions, and affidavits show (1) there is no genuine issue as to any material fact,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Marilyn M. Mulhall v. Advance Security, Inc., Figgie International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Jack T. Hammer v. Edward L. Slater, Loretta Slater, Herbert Jaffess, Renee JaffessCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. R. L. Kimsey Cotton Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Hall v. WingateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Martin v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Abdulla v. KlosinskiDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2012
  2. White v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
  3. In Re HughesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1998
  4. Huddleston v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1999
  5. Manning v. Engelhard Corp.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API