Legal Opinion

Jack T. Hammer v. Edward L. Slater, Loretta Slater, Herbert Jaffess, Renee Jaffess

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 18, 1994No. 93-8917PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiff-appellant, Jack Hammer, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendant-appellees, Herbert and Renee Jaffess, in this diversity action for libel and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Because we find that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to the Jaffesses’ actual malice with respect to the libel claim, we reverse in part and remand for further proceedings. We affirm the court’s grant of summary judgment on the claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

I. BACKGROUND

Many of the basic facts underlying…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Fitzpatrick v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Young v. City of Augusta Ex Rel. DeVaneyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Riley v. NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Bass v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Dunn v. DunnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
  5. Church of Scientology of Georgia, Inc. v. City of Sandy SpringsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API