Legal Opinion

Hall v. Wingate

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 19, 1924No. 4252PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

After a careful and painstaking review of the voluminous record in this case, there appears to be no reason why there should be a reversal of the judgment of the trial court upon any of the various rulings as to which complaint is made. The law of the ease was practically settled by the ruling upon the demurrers to' the answer of the defendant and the amendment thereto, in which the defendant sought by way of cross-bill to secure affirmative relief in his own behalf. The cross-bill was attacked upon the-ground that the alleged contract was unilateral and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brown v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Printup v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  3. Robson & Evans v. WeilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Zipperer v. HelmnlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  5. Mayor of Dublin v. DudleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Martin v. Approved Bancredit Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. R. L. Kimsey Cotton Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Wehunt v. PritchettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  4. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co. v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. McMurray v. BatemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API