Legal Opinion

State v. Goodell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 18, 1987No. G84-345 CA A38647 [control] and G84-346, G84-347, G85-73, G85-74 CA A38648PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The state appeals from orders dismissing citations that allege violations of commercial fishing regulations. Defendants are Chinook Indians who were fishing at usual and accustomed Chinook fishing locations on the Columbia River when they received the citations. The trial court held that, under State v. Goodell, 38 Or App 511, 590 P2d 764, rev den 287 Or 123 (1979), defendants had a treaty right to fish at those locations and that that right precluded state regulation. The state asks us to reconsider Goodell in the light of Wahkiakum Band of Chinook Indians v. Bateman, 655 F2d 176 (9th Cir…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Halbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. GoodellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Van De Hey v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. State v. PerankUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. PerankUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Williams v. ORRCODistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API