Legal Opinion
Stanley v. Goodwin
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided August 8, 2006No. Civ. 05-00716 ACK/LEKPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE; AND NOT ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KAY, Senior District Judge.
BACKGROUND
I. Procedural Background
Pro se Plaintiff Charles Anthony Stanley (“Plaintiff’) initiated this action by filing a complaint against Scott Goodwin (“Goodwin”), Sears & Roebuck, Inc. (“Sears”), and its C.E.O. Mr. “doe” Lacey (“Lacey”) (hereafter collectively “Defendants”) on November 15, 2005. On December 22, 2005, Magistrate Judge Kobayashi granted…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- (PC) Pratt v. Sacramento Protection ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PS) Harp v. The Modesto Gospel MissionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Annis v. HamiltonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Bailey v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Boyd v. South Point Hotel and CasinoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.