Legal Opinion

Annis v. Hamilton

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 28, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00051Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AUDREY ANN ANNIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00051-DAD-SKO 12 Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER 13 v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: 14 RACHEL HAMILTON, et al., (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR 15 Defendants. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE 16 WISHES TO STAND ON HIS COMPLAINT 17 (Doc. 1) 18 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 19 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR “NON- 20 JUDICIAL TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER” 21 (Doc. 3) 22 23 24 Plaintiff Audrey Ann Annis is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. 25 Plaintiff filed his…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API