Legal Opinion

(PC) Pratt v. Sacramento Protection Services

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 30, 2023No. 2:22-cv-02117Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EUGENE PRATT, JR., No. 2:22-cv-2117 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SACRAMENTO PROTECTION SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a jail inmate, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, with a civil rights suit 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s amended complaint is before the court. As discussed below, 19 plaintiff’s amended complaint should be dismissed without prejudice. 20 Screening Standards 21 The court is required to screen complaints brought…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API