Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Hoffman

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 28, 2025No. 3:23-cv-01750Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EDWARD BAILEY, Case No. 3:23-cv-01750-JR Plaintiff, ORDER v. KEN MCCLEOD; MIKE SCHMIDT; OFFICER HILL; OFFICER BURNS; JESSE HOFFMAN; CHRISTOPHER RAMRAS; and ETHAN BODEGOM, Defendants. NELSON, District Judge Plaintiff brings this

42 U.S.C. § 1983

civil rights action as a self-represented litigant. Currently before the Court is plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint (ECF No. 39). BACKGROUND Plaintiff originated this action by filing a Complaint (ECF No. 1) containing claims premised upon a December 2022 arrest; plaintiff alleged claims…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API