Legal Opinion

Masaki v. General Motors Corp.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1989No. 13023PublishedCited by 156 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, C.J.

In this products liability case, Defendants-Appcllanls General Motors Corporation (GM) and Servco Pacific, Inc. (Scrvco) appeal a trial court judgment in favor of Plaintiffs-Appcllees Steven Masaki, and his parents Frank and Sumiyc Masaki. Steven was severely injured when he was ran over by a GM van which Appellees claimed “self-shifted” into reverse gear due to a product defect. A jury found that the van was defective and that GM was negligent, and awarded Masaki compensatory and punitive damages. Appellants allege numerous trial court errors including…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by156 opinions

  1. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API