Legal Opinion
United States v. Rose
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided May 24, 2012No. 09-5003/AFPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge RYAN
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Under Article 67(a)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 867(a)(2) (2006), the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force (TJAG) certified the following issue:
WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN FINDING INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL IN THIS CASE.
We answer the question in the negative, albeit under different reasoning than the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA). Where, as here, a defendant’s reasonable request for information regarding sex offender registration was “a key concern”…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. GoingsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. Specialist REINEL CASA-GARCIAArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2012
- United States v. ArnoldNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. Bailey, Jr.Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.