Legal Opinion

Grey v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 9, 1990No. 588-84LPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This action addresses the delivery of irrigation water resources to Native American Allottees residing on the Salt River Indian Reservation. Water resources of the Salt River Valley are controlled by the Salt River Project whose six reservoirs store water from the Salt and Verde Rivers. The stored water is then delivered to the reservation and to more than 1.5 million people living in the Phoenix Metropolitan area.

Plaintiffs are holders of fractional to full interests in various allotments of lands on the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation. They…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Simmons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  4. Warr v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API