Legal Opinion
Brown v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 28, 1994No. 91-898LPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the United States Court of Federal Claims on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment, as well as Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs, certain Indian owners of allotted land on the Salt River Reservation, seek money damages from the United States for breach of a fiduciary duty based on an alleged trust relationship between them and the government arguably stemming from authority implicit in 25 U.S.C. § 415(a) and related regulations 25 C.F.R. Part 162.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.