C. S. Emery & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mollison, Judge:
The merchandise the subject of this protest is described on the invoice as “White Pine Lumber D2S & M.” It was assessed with duty at the rate of 16% per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Presidential proclamations reported in T. D.’s 52373 and 52476, for manufactures of wood, not specially provided for.
The plaintiff contends that the merchandise at bar is not a manufacture of wood, but is wood or lumber material. The protest as originally filed claimed that the merchandise was properly classifiable under the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. Myers & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Carr v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
3Cited by8 opinions
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Holmes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Drittler v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- C. B. Smith Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.