Legal Opinion
Coppinger-Martin v. Solis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 30, 2010No. 09-73725PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Carole Coppinger-Martin alleges that Nordstrom, Inc. violated the whistleblower-protection provision of the SarbanesAct of 2002(SOX), 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, by terminating her employment in retaliation for her reporting to supervisors conduct she believed violated the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). She petitions for review of the final order of the United States Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) that dismissed her complaint as untimely filed. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 1514A(b)(2)(A) and 49…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Saeid B. Amini v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Lukovsky v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- James F. Santa Maria v. Pacific BellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Curtis Rookaird v. Bnsf Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Araujo v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Thomas Kuduk v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Armstrong v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.