Legal Opinion
Araujo v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 19, 2013No. 12-2148PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
Anthony Araujo filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging that he was disciplined by New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. (“NJT”) in retaliation for his participation in an activity protected by the Federal Rail Safety Act, 49 U.S.C. § 20109 (“FRSA”). Specifically, Araujo reported an emotional injury after he witnessed a fatal accident on February 25, 2008. The District Court (Judge Stanley R. Chesler) found that the discipline was not retaliatory and granted NJT’s motion for summary judgment. See Araujo v. New…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Ali Razak v. Uber Technologies IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Jeffrey Wiest v. Tyco Electronics CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Thomas Kuduk v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Joseph Egan v. Delaware River Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Charles Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.