Legal Opinion
Smith & McDannald v. State Industrial Com.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 13, 1928No. 17961PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
This is an original action filed in this court by plaintiffs in error, petitioners, -to review an award made by the State Industrial Commission on the 16th day of October, 1926, wherein respondent Alvin James Branham was awarded $18 per week for temporary total disability, which order and judgment of the State Industrial Commission petitioners ask this court to vacate and set aside.
(Petitioners allege eleven different grounds or reasons why said award of the Industrial Commission should be vacated and set aside, which may be considered under two heads:(1) That the award is not supported by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dosen v. East Butte Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
- Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Wick v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Chandler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- Scruggs Bros. & Bill Garage v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Betz v. Columbia Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Thompson v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Christian v. HannaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- McConnell v. Murphy Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- Barnsdall Refining Co. v. RamsdallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.