Legal Opinion

Millers' Mutual Insurance v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 18, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 84-K-2393PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*302MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Millers’ Mutual Insurance Association filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment that defendant Iowa National Insurance Company is required to contribute on a pro-rata basis to the defense costs of suits involving the parties’ mutual insured. Millers’ also seeks money damages for the defendant’s past failure to contribute to such costs.

This court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as the parties are completely diverse and the amount in controversy exceeds $10,000.00. This matter is before me now on Iowa’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Pauline v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. MILLERS'MUT. INS. v. Iowa Nat. Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985
  3. Cotter Corp. v. American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1986
  5. Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API