Legal Opinion

Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 17, 1989No. 87SC341Published

1Opinion of the Court

768 P.2d 678 (1989)

Nick KANE; Penny Kane; Nicky's, Ltd., a Colorado corporation; and Fall River Chalet Condominium Association, a Colorado non-profit corporation, Petitioners,

v.

ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, an Illinois corporation; American and Foreign Insurance Company, a Delaware corporation; and Reliance Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, Respondents.

No. 87SC341.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

January 17, 1989.

Rehearing Denied February 6, 1989.

French & Stone, P.C., Joseph C. French, David M. Haynes, Boulder, for petitioners.

Anstine & Hill, William C. Jolliffe, Arthur…

Also in this document: Dissent · Lohr; Dissent · Lohr.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Villella v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. Union Rural Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API