Legal Opinion

Berghauser v. Golden State Orchards

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1929No. Docket No. Sac. 4302PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The judgment is affirmed.

After a careful reconsideration of this cause, particularly in the light of the authorities especially urged by appellant, we. find ourselves wholly in accord with and are pleased to adopt as the opinion of this court in bank herein, the following opinion written by Mr. Justice Plummer of the Third Appellate District, supplemented, however, by a more extended review of the authority upon which it is based:

1 ‘ This action was brought by the plaintiff ito recover judgment against the defendant, Golden State Orchards, a corporation, upon two promissory notes. Upon the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Kimball v. Richardson Kimball Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Isaacs v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Potlatch Lumber Co. v. RunkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Continental Vinyl Products Corp. v. Mead Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Bechtel v. AxelrodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Christensen v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Beshara v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Olson v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API