Legal Opinion

Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. Stanley

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1953No. Civ. 16008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Petition for a writ of mandate to compel respondent to execute bonds of the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.

Question Presented

The validity of the bonds, dependent upon the constitutionality of the special act creating said district.

Record

Respondent has demurred to the petition on the ground that the act creating the district is unconstitutional as being special legislation prohibited by the California Constitution. The pertinent facts set forth in the petition follow. The district is a body corporate and politic of the state, organized and existing under the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  5. People ex rel. Graves v. McFaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Porter v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Monterey County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Robbins v. Sonoma County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API