Legal Opinion
Robbins v. Sonoma County Flood Control & Water Conservation District
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 5, 1956No. Civ. 8972PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
Respondents herein have moved to dismiss the appeal.
Appellants began an action in the Sonoma County Superior Court wherein they sought to enjoin the issuance and sale of the bonds of Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, respondent herein. By the second count of their complaint plaintiffs also sought declaratory relief. The trial court sustained a general demurrer, without leave to amend, and entered judgment that appellants take nothing. From that judgment they appeal. In opposition to the motion to dismiss, as opposed to the hearing of the appeal on the merits,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peery v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- American River Flood Control District v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Elwell v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vanoni v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. SpinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Monette-Shaw v. San Francisco Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Associated Students of North Peralta Community College v. Board of Trustees of Peralta Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Zimmerman v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.