Legal Opinion

Frenzer v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1938No. Civ. 5910PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, J.

This is an action to recover upon an accident policy issued by defendant herein. Judgment was in favor of plaintiff from which defendant prosecutes this appeal.

The principal grounds for reversal are the insufficiency of the evidence to establish an accident or accidental injury; the interpretation of the provisions in the policy requiring the accidental injury to be completely disabling from the date of the accident, and the meaning and effect of part K of the policy.

In 1923 the Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Association issued to Archie Zugar a policy of health and accident insurance,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jenkin v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. RyderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  3. Feeley v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Thomas v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Austero v. National Casualty Co. of DetroitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Samura v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Willden v. Washington National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. National Life & Accident Insurance v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API