Jenkin v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
On the trial of this case, before the court without a jury, the judgment was for defendant and the plaintiff brings this appeal from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
This action is brought by the assignee of the beneficiary of an accident policy issued by defendant to George Douglas Atcherly Crosbie in the lifetime of said Crosbie. By the terms of the policy the sum of ten thousand dollars was to be paid to Mrs. Annie Mercer George (grandmother), “after due notice and satisfactory proof that the insured has, during the continuance of this policy, sustained such violent and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Travellers' Insurance v. McConkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Travelers Insurance v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Mallory v. . the Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Jones v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Richards v. Travelers Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Brunswick v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- Shepherd v. Midland Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.