Legal Opinion

Neeson v. Bluth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 12, 1933No. 2881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is a personal injury suit brought by appellee, individually and as next friend of liis minor son, Virgil Bluth, against J. T. Nee-son and Employers’ Casualty Company resulting in a judgment against both defendants awarding damages.

Neeson was' the owner of an automobile used for family purposes. He carried insurance written 'by the casualty company protecting him against loss from liability imposed by law for bodily injury accidentally sustained by any person if caused by the ownership, maintenance, or use of his car..Virgil Bluth was riding a motorcycle traveling in a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Automobile Ins. Co. v. StruweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines v. GrassoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Texas Landscape Co. v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Kuntz v. SpenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Ray v. MoxonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bluth v. NeesonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Torres v. DishmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API