Industrial Hard Chrome. Ltd. v. Hetran, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court is defendants motion to dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12®, plaintiffs’ third amended complaint. For the following reasons, the court grants in part and denies in part defendants’ motion to dismiss.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Industrial Hard Chrome, Limited (“IHC”), IHC Limited Partnership (“IHCLP”) and Bar Technologies, L.L.C. (“Bar”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) bring this diversity action against defendants Hetran, Incorporated (“Hetran”) and Global Technology, Incorporated (“Global”)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Craig S. Strauss v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Chicago Police Officer John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Jorge Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education and Ted Sanders, in His Official Capacity as Illinois State Superintendent of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Baldwin v. Star Scientific, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Corwin v. Connecticut Valley Arms, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- MacNeil Automotive Products, Ltd. v. Cannon Automotive Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Muehlbauer v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Spector v. Mondelez International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.