Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

MacNeil Automotive Products, Ltd. v. Cannon Automotive Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 25, 2010No. 08 C 139PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge.

This case arises from defendant Cannon Automotive Limited’s (“Cannon”) supply of allegedly defective automobile floor mats to MacNeil Automotive Products, Limited (“MacNeil”), which contracted to supply those mats to automakers Hyundai and BMW. According to MacNeil, Cannon supplied floor mats in which the carpet portion and the rubber portion of the mats did not properly adhere. MacNeil asserts eight causes of action, including breach of contract, breach of warranties, consumer fraud, and conversion. This case is presently before…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Stoebner v. Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C. (In re Polaroid Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  2. Tile Unlimited, Inc. v. Blanke Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Joseph v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Andrew v. Wexford of Indiana LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  5. Andrew v. Wexford of Indiana LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API