Legal Opinion

Crosby v. United States

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided April 9, 1999No. A95-359 CV JWSPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER FROM CHAMBERS

[Re: Motion to Dismiss — Docket 100]

SEDWICK, District Judge.

I.MOTION PRESENTED

At docket 100, defendant United States of America (“United States”) moves to dismiss plaintiff Margaret Crosby’s (“Crosby”) claim for loss of chance. 1 Crosby opposes the motion. Earlier, this court certified the relevant questions of law to the Alaska Supreme Court, which declined to accept certification. 2 On return from the Alaska Supreme Court, the parties adopted their original motion papers. Oral argument was heard on April 9, 1999.

II.BACKGROUND

This is a medical malpractice case filed under…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Pfiffner v. CorreaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brady, M. v. Urbas D.P.M., W., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Smith v. ParrottSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. Contois v. Town of West WarwickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  4. Dow Tillson and Susan Tillson v. Richard A. Lane, M.D. and Lane Eye AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. Mann v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API