Legal Opinion

Smith v. Parrott

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 1, 2003No. 02-322PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Allen, C.J. (Ret.),

¶ 1. Specially Assigned. Stephen L. Smith, plaintiff in this medical malpractice action, appeals from a summary judgment of the Windsor Superior Court in favor of defendant Thomas Parrott, M.D. Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in: (1) finding that plaintiff had failed to show a probability that Dr. Parrott’s negligence was the cause of his paralysis; and (2) rejecting plaintiffs theory of recovery based on a showing that Dr. Parrott’s negligence had reduced plaintiffs chances of recovery, even if it was not the probable cause of his injuries. We affirm.

¶ 2. The…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Kramer v. Lewisville Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Gooding v. University Hosp. Bldg., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. Kilpatrick v. BryantTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Smyth v. Twin State Improvement Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Matsuyama v. BirnbaumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Toney v. Chester County HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Contois v. Town of West WarwickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  5. Price v. Town of FairleeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API