Legal Opinion

Brady, M. v. Urbas D.P.M., W., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 2015No. 74 MAP 2014PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice SAYLOR.

In this appeal by allowance involving alleged medical negligence, we consider whether a doctor may introduce evidence that the patient was informed of and acknowledged various risks of surgery, although the complaint does not assert a cause of action based on a lack of informed consent.

Appellee, Maria Brady, had a lengthy history of foot problems. By 2007, both of her feet were in pain due to toe deformities. Appellee’s podiatrist, William Urbas, D.P.M., successfully treated toes on her left foot with surgery; he then turned his attention to her right foot.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Crouse v. Cyclops IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Mitchell, L. v. E. Shikora, D.O., Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. In Re: B. Fiedler, Appeal of: E. FiedlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Crespo, A. v. Hughes, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Wilson v. P.B. Patel, M.D., P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  5. Coughlin, A., Aplt. v. Massaquoi, U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API