Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Goldston
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice.
INTRODUCTION
This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying Appellants Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Surgitek, Inc., Medical Engineering Corporation, CBI Medical, Inc., and Natural Y/Aesthetech’s (“Defendants”) 2 motions to transfer venue and motions to strike joinders and interventions. We are asked to decide whether breast implants are consumer goods under the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code and whether the joining plaintiffs 3 have established an essential need to try their claims in Wichita County. We affirm in part and reverse and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
3Cited by12 opinions
- American Home Products Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. ShoresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- American Home Products Corp. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- American Home Products Corp. v. Clark, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.