Legal Opinion

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Goldston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 8, 1998No. 2-97-249-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAY, Justice.

Introduction and Holding

This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellants Bristol-Myers Squibb and Cbi Medical’s 1 challenge to venue based on the joinder of multiple plaintiffs. 2 We are asked to decide whether, under a settlement opt-out agreement that allowed plaintiffs to opt-out and “retain all rights ... that existed prior to the ... agreement,” pre-1995 or post-1995 venue law applies to the joinder of multiple plaintiffs. Because we find that the agreement did not prevent post-1995 venue law from applying, we reverse the trial court’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Travelers' Ass'n v. BranumTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Snyder v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Accelerated Christian Education, Inc. v. Oracle Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  4. Fidelity Union Life Insurance Company v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bonner v. HearneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. AbelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Wooley v. AMCARE HEALTH PLANS OF LOUISIANALouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. GoldstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Arntz Builders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Abel v. Surgitek, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API