Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Goldston
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAY, Justice.
Introduction and Holding
This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellants Bristol-Myers Squibb and Cbi Medical’s 1 challenge to venue based on the joinder of multiple plaintiffs. 2 We are asked to decide whether, under a settlement opt-out agreement that allowed plaintiffs to opt-out and “retain all rights ... that existed prior to the ... agreement,” pre-1995 or post-1995 venue law applies to the joinder of multiple plaintiffs. Because we find that the agreement did not prevent post-1995 venue law from applying, we reverse the trial court’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Travelers' Ass'n v. BranumTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Snyder v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Accelerated Christian Education, Inc. v. Oracle Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
- Fidelity Union Life Insurance Company v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Bonner v. HearneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. AbelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Wooley v. AMCARE HEALTH PLANS OF LOUISIANALouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. GoldstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Arntz Builders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Abel v. Surgitek, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.