Legal Opinion
Surgitek, Inc. v. Adams
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided October 9, 1997No. 13-97-332-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODRIGUEZ, Justice.
This is an accelerated appeal pursuant to Tex. Civ. PüAC. & Rem.Code Ann. § 15.003(c) (Vernon Supp.1997). 1 Appellants, three of forty-five defendants below, claim the trial court erred in denying their motion to transfer venue and erred in permitting the joinder of plaintiffs who are unable to independently establish their right to bring suit in Cameron County.
This litigation involves seventy-five plaintiffs who brought suit in Cameron County, Texas asserting negligence causes of action against forty-two doctors and three manufacturers of silicone gel breast…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Sorokolit v. RhodesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Linwood v. NCNB TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Barber v. Colorado Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. AbelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- American Home Products Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Southern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ochoa, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Blalock Prescription Center, Inc. v. Lopez-Guerra, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Alert Synteks, Inc. v. Jerry Spencer, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.