Legal Opinion
Coy v. Raabe
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1969No. 39834PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
This is the third and hopefully a final opinion of this court in this one case. The two previous opinions, Graham v. Raabe, 62 Wn.2d 753, 384 P.2d 629 (1963), and Coy v. Raabe, 69 Wn.2d 346, 418 P.2d 728 (1966), established that Gary Guy Coy had a valid lease and option to purchase certain real property owned by Buford Raabe, but that in order to exercise that option Coy had to reimburse Raabe for the money advanced by Raabe in purchasing and maintaining the property.
The chain of events leading up to the present appeal is extremely complex. However, for the most part they have been set forth…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Coy v. RaabeWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Hanna v. HaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Carstens Packing Co. v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Graham v. RaabeWashington Supreme Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnson v. Harrigan-Peach Land Development Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
- Ford v. Bellingham-Whatcom County District Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- TMT Bear Creek Shopping Center, Inc. v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- House v. ErwinWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Tradewell Stores, Inc. v. T. B. & M., Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.