Coy v. Raabe
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
This is an equitable action in which the plaintiff seeks a decree of specific performance to enforce an option to buy certain real property. The option to buy is contained in a lease. The defense is two-pronged and, by its nature, in the alternative: (1) the lease and option are invalid; and (2) defendants and intervenor are entitled to be paid, under the doctrine of subrogation, for certain liens against the property, which they paid.
In general, the same questions were presented to us on a prior appeal. Graham v. Raabe, 62 Wn.2d 753, 384 P.2d 629 (1963). The questions decided in our former…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Credit Bureau Corp. v. BecksteadWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Graham v. RaabeWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Omicron Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jeffrey Mort Pamela Mort Fred Strefling Jeffrey Tobian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Universal Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Kottler v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Kottler v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Hu Hyun Kim v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.