Legal Opinion

Coy v. Raabe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1966No. 38175PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This is an equitable action in which the plaintiff seeks a decree of specific performance to enforce an option to buy certain real property. The option to buy is contained in a lease. The defense is two-pronged and, by its nature, in the alternative: (1) the lease and option are invalid; and (2) defendants and intervenor are entitled to be paid, under the doctrine of subrogation, for certain liens against the property, which they paid.

In general, the same questions were presented to us on a prior appeal. Graham v. Raabe, 62 Wn.2d 753, 384 P.2d 629 (1963). The questions decided in our former…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Credit Bureau Corp. v. BecksteadWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Graham v. RaabeWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Omicron Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Mort Pamela Mort Fred Strefling Jeffrey Tobian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Universal Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. Kottler v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kottler v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hu Hyun Kim v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API