Legal Opinion

Graham v. Raabe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1963No. 36440PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The issue presented here is whether certain of the defendants have a right of subrogation to certain county and federal tax liens.

The plaintiff, Gary Guy Coy, has secured a judgment establishing his right to possession of certain property as a lessee, and from this portion of the judgment no appeal has been taken. It is an option to purchase, contained in that lease, which brings the case to this court.

The trial court has attempted to make Gary Coy’s exercise of that option subject to the rights of subrogation to county and federal tax liens claimed by certain defendants; and from this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Sheldon State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Michigan Hospital Service v. SharpeMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Trimble v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Becker v. Mayor & Council of Little FerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  5. Luikart v. BuckNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coy v. RaabeWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Coy v. RaabeWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Credit Bureau Corp. v. BecksteadWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Allied Stores Corp. v. North West BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Raabe v. CoyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API