Legal Opinion

Berkowitz v. Baron

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 14, 1977No. 70 Civ. 5139 (JMC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

CANNELLA, District Judge.

After a bench trial of this securities fraud action brought pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, and the common law of the State of New York, plaintiff Howard Hoffman is granted judgmént against defendants Gail and Joel Baron and Benjamin S. Markowe & Company (“Markowe”) in the amount of $550. The claims asserted by plaintiffs Nathaniel Berkowitz and Edward Yaste are dismissed with prejudice, as are the counterclaims interposed by the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anixter v. Home-Stake Production Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1977
  2. State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  3. Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. Virgilio Flores, S.A. v. Jerome Radelman, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
  5. Johnson & Staley, Inc. v. Bushan & Levy, P. C.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API