Legal Opinion
Johnson & Staley, Inc. v. Bushan & Levy, P. C.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 18, 1981No. 81 Civ. 4544PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
This action arises out of the purchase of all the stock of Bainbridge, Kimpton & Haupt, Inc. (“Bainbridge”) by the plaintiff in December, 1978. Plaintiff alleges that, in connection with the sale, defendants violated section 17 of the Securities Act of 1933 and section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, and that they also committed various common law violations. Defendant Bushan & Levy moves to dismiss the complaint in its entirety pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Both parties, however, rely on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Ltd., Inc. v. McCrory Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Ferber v. Travelers Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
- Mishkin Ex Rel. Liquidation of the Business of Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp. v. Ensminger (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Whitbread (US) Holdings, Inc. v. Baron Philippe De RothschildDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Dannenberg v. DorisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985