Legal Opinion
Cresswell v. Sullivan & Cromwell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 11, 1989No. 87 Civ. 2685 (RWS), 88 Civ. 2221 (RWS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Prudential-Bache Securities Inc. (“Bache”) has moved in limine to preclude the deposition and trial testimony of Edward J. Swan, Esq. (“Swan”) who represented certain of the plaintiffs in Cresswell v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc., 83 Civ. 2099 (RWS) (“Cresswell I”) on the grounds that the contingency fee arrangement between Swan and counsel for the plaintiffs here, Richard Cooper, Esq. (“Cooper”) is improper. Sullivan and Cromwell has moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint in this action of Plaintiffs Edward…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Banque Arabe Et Internationale D'Investissement v. Maryland National BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Conservative Club of Washington v. FinkelsteinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.