Legal Opinion
Anixter v. Home-Stake Production Co.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided July 29, 1977No. MDL No. 153 and Civ. A. Nos. 73-C-382, 73-C-377, 74-C-244, 75-C-431 and 75-C-432PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER RE CLASS ACTIONS
BOLDT, District Judge, By Designation.
The Anixter, Luce and Robertson (“ALR”) plaintiffs1 in the four above-captioned actions have moved for orders determining that those actions shall proceed as class actions. Further, they seek determinations, in each case, that the classes consist of all persons or entities who purchased participating interests (“units”) in oil or gas drilling programs offered by Home-Stake Production Company (hereinafter Home-Stake) or its subsidiaries and who were holders of such units as of September 20, 1973, and the successors in…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In Re Interbank Funding Corp. SEC. LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Adams v. ReaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Sullivan v. Chase Investment Services of Boston, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. v. MarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.