Legal Opinion

Reinstatement of Polk v. Office of Lawyer Regulation

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2007No. 2006AP3096-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. In this matter we are asked to review the petition by Attorney Brian K. Polk for the reinstatement of his license to practice law in this state following an administrative suspension of three or more consecutive years due to his failure to comply with the mandatory reporting requirements for continuing legal education (CLE). We determine at the conclusion of the process described below, that Attorney Polk's petition for reinstatement should be denied. We also conclude that Attorney Polk should he required to pay the costs of this reinstatement proceeding, which totaled $6232.45, as of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against FitzgeraldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against HausmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against RayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. KelsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against FelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Kenyatta RileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Polk v. OFFICE OF LAWYER REGULATIONWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Kenyatta RileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API