Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kelsay

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2003No. 02-2239-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the referee's recommendation that Attorney Kevin Kelsay receive a *18public reprimand for professional misconduct. We conclude that a public reprimand is insufficient to address the seriousness of Attorney Kelsay's professional misconduct, and we hereby suspend Attorney Kelsay's license to practice law in Wisconsin for a period of six months. We agree that Attorney Kelsay should be required to pay the costs of the proceeding.

¶ 2. Attorney Kelsay was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1984. His license to practice law in Wisconsin is presently under suspension. In October…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against KelsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Polk v. OFFICE OF LAWYER REGULATIONWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Reinstatement of Polk v. Office of Lawyer RegulationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. BriggsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against KelsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API